Legal Opinion

Chapman v. Meyers

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided May 7, 1909No. 15,676PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from the district court for Otoe county: Paul Jessen, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtBarnes, J.

Action to recover money alleged to have been obtained by fraud and under a mistake of fact. The plaintiff had judgment and defendant has appealed.

*369The undisputed facts, as disclosed by the record, are that in May, 1899, the plaintiff was the owner of lots 3 and b, in block 32, of South Nebraska City, on which there was due and delinquent a large amount of state, county and city taxes; that the lots had been purchased at delinquent tax sale by the county of Otoe, and on the 2d day of that month the county sold its claim therefor, and issued its two certificates of sale thereon to the defendant;…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Johnston v. SpencerNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Clark v. DaytonNebraska Supreme Court · 1877
  3. Aultman & Taylor Co. v. SteinanNebraska Supreme Court · 1879
  4. Tepoel v. Saunders County National BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1888

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Elliott v. City of AuburnNebraska Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Preferred Pictures Corp. v. ThompsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1960
  3. U. S. Theatre Supply Co. v. CrealNebraska Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Getty v. North River InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API