Legal Opinion

Tepoel v. Saunders County National Bank

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1888PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error to the district court for Saunders county. Tried below before Marshall, J.

1Opinion of the CourtMaxwell, J.

This is an action on a promissory note, of which the following is a copy:

“ 250.00 Waitoo, Neb., July 28, 1884.
“April 1, 1885, after date, for value received, I jointly and severally promise to pay to the order of H. H. Dorsey, at the Saunders County National Bank, of 'Wahoo, Nebraska, the sum of two hundred and fifty and no 100 dollars, with interest at ten per cent per annum,- payable, annually from maturity until paid.
“Herman Tepoel.”

The defenses set up in the answer are usury, fraud, and misrepresentation. On the trial of the cause in the court below, judgment was rendered in favor of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Aultman & Taylor Co. v. SteinanNebraska Supreme Court · 1879
  2. Arnold v. BakerNebraska Supreme Court · 1877

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Johnston v. SpencerNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Preferred Pictures Corp. v. ThompsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Chapman v. MeyersNebraska Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Crosby v. RitcheyNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Pierce, Wright & Co. v. DaveyNebraska Supreme Court · 1894

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API