Legal Opinion
Goodwin v. Legionville School Safety Patrol Training Center, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided April 19, 1988No. C9-87-1722PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MULALLY, Judge.
Appellant Josephine Goodwin appeals from an order, dated July 27,1987, denying her motion for a new trial. At the close of all the evidence, the trial court directed a verdict in favor of the respondents, Legion-ville School Safety Patrol Training Center, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as Legionville) and Grande Voitures Du Minnesota, La Societe Des Quarante Hommes, et Huit Chevaux (hereinafter 40 & 8). Findings of facts, conclusions of law and order for judgment were entered on June 26, 1987. A motion for a new trial pursuant to Minn.R.Civ.P. 59.01(7) contended that the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Peterson v. BalachSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
- Armstrong v. MailandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Olson v. HansenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
- Sullivan v. F. D. Chapman Construction Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- Peterson v. Little-Giant Glencoe Portable Elevator Division of Dynamics Corp. of AmericaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Andren v. White-Rodgers Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
- Christopher Walk v. Starkey MachineryCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
- Reimer v. City Of CrookstonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
- THS Northstar Associates v. WR Grace & Co.-Conn.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1994
- Robert Reimer v. City of CrookstonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.