Legal Opinion
Syth v. Parke
Idaho Supreme Court
Decided July 29, 1991No. 18437Published
1Opinion of the Court
823 P.2d 760 (1991)
121 Idaho 156
Thomas W. SYTH and Cindy Syth, husband and wife, Plaintiffs-respondents,
v.
David L. PARKE, D.C., and B.C. Rene Parke, husband and wife, dba Pend Oreille Chiropractic Center, Defendants-appellants.
No. 18437.
Supreme Court of Idaho, Coeur d'Alene, October 1990 Term.
May 23, 1991.
Rehearing Granted July 29, 1991.
Cosho, Humphrey, Greener & Welsh, Boise, for defendants-appellants, Kathryn A. Sticklen argued.
Howard & Owens, Coeur d'Alene, for plaintiffs-respondents. R. Bruce Owens argued.
BAKES, Chief Justice.
This appeal arises from a claim of malpractice against a…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Obray v. MitchellIdaho Supreme Court · 1977
- H & v Engineering, Inc. v. Idaho State Board of Professional Engineers & Land SurveyorsIdaho Supreme Court · 1987
- First Security Bank of Idaho National Ass'n v. NeibaurIdaho Supreme Court · 1977
- Coeur D'Alene Turf Club, Inc. v. CogswellIdaho Supreme Court · 1969
- Spivey v. District Court of Third Judicial DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1923
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.