Legal Opinion
Mayfield v. Esplanade Gardens, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 22, 2006PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Lewis Bart Stone, J.), entered December 12, 2003, which denied petitioner’s application to annul the determination of respondent New York City Department of Housing Preservation and Development (HPD) denying petitioner succession rights in Mitchell-Lama housing, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Whatever the scope of due process concerns raised by HPD’s rules providing for succession rights in Mitchell-Lama housing (cf. Allerton Coops Tenants Assn. v Biderman, 189 AD2d 249, 253 [1993]), a full-blown evidentiary or “in person” hearing was not required…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Uniform Firefighters of Cohoes v. City of CohoesNew York Court of Appeals · 2000
- Fuller v. UrstadtNew York Court of Appeals · 1971
- Allerton Coops Tenants Ass'n v. BidermanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
3Cited by1 opinion
- Belok v. New York City Department of Housing Preservation & DevelopmentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011