Legal Opinion
Belok v. New York City Department of Housing Preservation & Development
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 17, 2011PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*580The determination that petitioner did not sustain his burden of establishing his entitlement to succession rights to his deceased parents’ apartment had a rational basis in the record (see Matter of Quan v New York City Dept. of Hous. Preserv. & Dev., 70 AD3d 528 [2010], lv denied 17 NY3d 703 [2011]; Matter of Hochhauser v City of N.Y. Dept. of Hous. Preserov. & Dev., 48 AD3d 288 [2008]). The governing regulatory agreement required that persons seeking succession rights be listed on annual income affidavits for the two years prior to the departure of the cooperator of record. Petitioner’s…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- MATTER OF YARBOUGH v. FrancoNew York Court of Appeals · 2000
- Hochhauser v. City of New York Department of Housing Preservation & DevelopmentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Pizarro v. Evergreen Estates HousingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Mayfield v. Esplanade Gardens, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
3Cited by12 opinions
- Mejia v. RamosAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Board of Directors of Windsor Owners Corp. v. PlattAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- Matter of Benjamin v. Department of Hous. Preserv. & Dev. of the City of N.Y.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
- Chang v. Division of HousingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- Mafes v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.