Legal Opinion
Hehl v. Chippewa & Red Cedar Valley Carpenters' District Council
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided June 26, 1958PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.
The conclusion of the circuit court that defendants’ conduct was unlawful was based upon its finding that they picketed for the purpose of coercing plaintiff to employ members of the union and to injure him because of his refusal to interfere with the rights of his employees with respect to joining a union.
Coercion or inducement of an employer to those ends would be an unfair labor practice under sec. 111.06 (2) (b), Stats., and could be enjoined by the circuit court if the law of Wisconsin alone were applicable.
Vogt, Inc., v. International Brotherhood (1956), 270 Wis. 315, 321b, 71 N. W.…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Denver Building & Construction Trades CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- United Construction Workers v. Laburnum Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1954
- International Union, United Automobile, Aircraft & Agricultural Implement Workers v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- International Ass'n of MacHinists v. GonzalesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Guss v. Utah Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Town & Country Motors, Inc. v. Local Union No. 328Michigan Supreme Court · 1959
- J.L. Manta, Inc. v. BraunCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- Hehl v. CHIPPEWA, ETC., DISTRICT COUNCILWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
- Town & Country Motors, Inc. v. Local Union No. 328Michigan Supreme Court · 1959