Legal Opinion
James Self, et al. v. BPX Operating, Co., et al.
District Court, W.D. Louisiana
Decided September 25, 2026No. 5:19-cv-00927Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA SHREVEPORT DIVISION JAMES SELF, ET AL. CIVIL ACTION NO. 19-0927 VERSUS JUDGE S. MAURICE HICKS, JR. BPX OPERATING, CO., ET AL. MAGISTRATE JUDGE HORNSBY MEMORANDUM RULING Before the Court is Defendant BPX Operating Company’s (“BPX”) Second Rule 12(b)(6) Motion for Partial Dismissal of Count 1. See Record Document 89. BPX’s motion seeks dismissal of Plaintiffs’ claim that post-production costs are not properly deductible from proceeds due to an unleased mineral interest owner (“UMO”) pursuant to Louisiana Revised Statute 30:10(A)(3)…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Allen Thompson v. City of Waco, TexasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2014
- B A Kelly Land v. Aethon EnergyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2022
- Amoco Production Co. v. ThompsonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1987
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.