Legal Opinion

Marriage of Schelmeske v. Veit

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided July 1, 1986No. C5-86-170PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LESLIE, Judge.

The non-custodial father appeals from a judgment increasing child support. We affirm.

FACTS

The marriage of the parties was" dissolved on August 24, 1978. The parties have two minor children, now ages sixteen and twelve. The decree, which was entered before the guidelines became effective, ordered appellant LaVern Veit to pay monthly child support of $450 for the two children. Both parties have remarried since the 1978 decree. Respondent Joyce Schelmeske has no children as a result of that marriage, and appellant has three children from his new marriage. Neither respondent…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Moylan v. MoylanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
  2. In Re the Marriage of DuBois v. DuBoisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  3. Marriage of Tell v. TellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
  4. Marriage of Vitalis v. VitalisCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  5. Maxson v. DerenceCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Baker v. BakerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1995
  2. In Re the Marriage of StewartMontana Supreme Court · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API