Legal Opinion

Logan v. Margolis

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided March 8, 1967No. 2 CA-CIV 278PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HATHAWAY, Chief Judge.

The appellant, Durlin F. Logan, was the defendant in a personal injury action which arose out of a motor vehicle accident in Tucson, Arizona. The appellees, Maurice *184H. Margolis and Helen Margolis, husband and wife, instituted the action to recover damages for personal injuries allegedly sustained by Mr. Margolis when his automobile collided with the rear end of the defendant’s milk truck.

The matter was tried to a jury which returned a plaintiff’s verdict. The appellant contends that the judgment must be reversed and the cause must be remanded for a new trial (1) because…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Village of Wonewoc v. TaubertWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Andrews v. City of MarionIndiana Supreme Court · 1943
  3. American Company of Arkansas v. BakerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1933
  4. Hunter v. McCarthyCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1944
  5. Rieck-Mcjunkin Dairy Co. v. GeorgeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1947

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bliss v. TreeceArizona Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Babbitt v. United Parcel Service, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API