State v. Shipman
Supreme Court of Missouri
Appeal from Newton Circuit Court. — L. M. Lloyd, Esq., Special Judge. (1) The application for a change of venue, on account of the prejudice cf the judge, was not supported by affidavits, as required by law, and was properly overruled. R. S., sec. 1877. A change of trial judges, on account oí alleged prejudice, can only be made-by complying with, tlie provisions of section 1877, supra.
Read the full summary
Appeal from Newton Circuit Court. — L. M. Lloyd, Esq., Special Judge. (1) The application for a change of venue, on account of the prejudice cf the judge, was not supported by affidavits, as required by law, and was properly overruled. R. S., sec. 1877. A change of trial judges, on account oí alleged prejudice, can only be made-by complying with, tlie provisions of section 1877, supra. State v. Brownfield, 83 Mo. 448. (2) The court did not err in refusing to permit appellant to withdraw his plea, of guilty. In the absence of anything showing that there was an abuse of discretion, the…
1Opinion of the CourtRay, J.
This case has an unusual and somewhat peculiar history. There is no brief oh file for the defendant, and, we learn from that of the attorney general, on behalf of the state, that the defendant is now in the penitentiary. It appears, from the record, that, on the first day of the February term of the Newton circuit court for the year 1883, there were present at the place of holding said court some twelve members of ¡ the bar of said court, besides the prosecuting attorney of said county, as well as the clerk of said court and the sheriff of said county. It also appears that the regular judge…
2Cited by12 opinions
- State v. CreightonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1932
- U'ren v. BagleyOregon Supreme Court · 1926
- Ex Parte JustusCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1909
- State v. SpiveySupreme Court of Missouri · 1905
- State v. MyersSupreme Court of Missouri · 1929
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.