Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Neffner v. Hummel

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 8, 1943No. 29601PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court.

The first question to engage bur attention is whether relator was in the classified service of the state at any time after April 1, 1940.

Begulation of civil service is provided for by the Constitution; Section 10, Article XV, reads as follows:

“Appointments and promotions in the civil service of the state * * * shall be made according to merit and fitness, to be ascertained, as far as practicable, by competitive examinations. Laws shall be passed providing for the enforcement of this provision.” (Italics ours.)

The underlying purposes which lead to the passage of this provision…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Myers v. BlakeOhio Supreme Court · 1929
  2. State Ex Rel. Townsend v. BerningOhio Supreme Court · 1939

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Jackson v. CoffeyOhio Supreme Court · 1977
  2. State Ex Rel. Alden E. Stilson & Associates, Ltd. v. FergusonOhio Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Card v. City of ClevelandDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2010
  4. International Union, United Automobile Workers v. McFaulOhio Court of Appeals · 2001
  5. Ago, Florida Attorney General Reports1976

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API