Legal Opinion

Seldin v. Seldin

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 20, 1967PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBernard S. Meyer, J.

In this separation action defendant amended his answer at the trial to admit abandonment and since the proof shows that he obtained a unilateral Mexican divorce, married another woman and is presently living with her, there is no question concerning plaintiff’s right to a separation. A number of questions arise, however, with respect to the nature of the decree to be made.

The complaint prays judgment separating plaintiff from defendant “ for a period of one year and nine months ”. While the court-has authority under section 200 of the Domestic Relations Law to decree a separation ‘ ‘ forever,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Johnson v. . JohnsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
  2. Barrere v. BarrereNew York Court of Chancery · 1819
  3. Murdock v. MurdockAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911
  4. Pollitzer v. PollitzerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917
  5. Goldsmith v. GoldsmithNew York Supreme Court · 1934

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Boswell v. BoswellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
  2. Pearson v. PearsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1970
  3. Roth v. RothNew York Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Boswell v. BoswellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
  5. Sheil v. SheilAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API