Seldin v. Seldin
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBernard S. Meyer, J.
In this separation action defendant amended his answer at the trial to admit abandonment and since the proof shows that he obtained a unilateral Mexican divorce, married another woman and is presently living with her, there is no question concerning plaintiff’s right to a separation. A number of questions arise, however, with respect to the nature of the decree to be made.
The complaint prays judgment separating plaintiff from defendant “ for a period of one year and nine months ”. While the court-has authority under section 200 of the Domestic Relations Law to decree a separation ‘ ‘ forever,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Johnson v. . JohnsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
- Barrere v. BarrereNew York Court of Chancery · 1819
- Murdock v. MurdockAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911
- Pollitzer v. PollitzerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917
- Goldsmith v. GoldsmithNew York Supreme Court · 1934
3Cited by5 opinions
- Boswell v. BoswellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
- Pearson v. PearsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1970
- Roth v. RothNew York Supreme Court · 1973
- Boswell v. BoswellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
- Sheil v. SheilAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1969