Poplar v. Hochschild, Kohn & Co.
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the CourtCollins, J.
Appellant brought an action in the Baltimore City Court against appellee on a declaration containing two counts. A demurrer was filed by the appellee. The first count of the declaration was based on an express warranty and the second count on implied warranty. The court below overruled the demurrer to the first count and sustained it to the second count without leave to amend. Appellant struck out the first count of the declaration by leave of court. Appellant -appeals to this court from the action of the trial court in sustaining the demurrer to the second count.
The count now before us is…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Goldman & Freiman Bottling Co. v. SindellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1922
- Armour & Co. v. LeasureCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1939
- Flaccomio v. EysinkCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1916
- State Ex Rel. Bond v. Consolidated Gas, Electric Light & Power Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1924
- Crandall v. Stop & Shop, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1937
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Poplar v. Bourjois, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1948
- Worley v. Proctor & Gamble Manufacturing Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1952
- Mead v. Coca Cola Bottling Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1952
- Sheeskin v. Giant Food, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1974
- Vaccarino v. CozzuboCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1943
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.