Legal Opinion

Lindman v. Carroll

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided April 13, 1925PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an action for personal injuries caused, as it is alleged, by the concurring negligence of those who obstructed, and permitted to be obstructed, a public street in Kansas City and the driver of an automobile which ran against plaintiff while walking in such street.

The locus in quo was the south side of Fifteenth Street, which runs east and west, immediately east of Troost Avenue, which runs north and south. The width of Fifteenth Street from curb to curb was seventy-six feet; a double-track street railway fifteen feet in width occupied the center, leaving a space of thirty and a half…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Searcy v. Noll Welty Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1922

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. L-M-S Inc. v. BlackwellTexas Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Koebel Ex Rel. Koebel v. Tieman Coal & Material Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1935
  3. Scotten v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1935
  4. State Ex Rel. City of Excelsior Springs v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1935
  5. Maher v. Donk Bros. Coal & Coke Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1929

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API