Legal Opinion

Gratzinger v. Arehart

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided December 19, 1935No. 26,659PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFansler, J.

Appellants, Kendallville Trust and Savings Company, Noble County Bank and Trust Company, and Vermont Finley as receiver of the Noble County Bank and Trust Company, were defendants below. Charles E. Gratzinger and the other appellants, eight in number, and the numerous appellees, were plaintiffs. It appears from the special findings of fact that, prior to December 31, 1928, the Kendallville Trust and Savings Company was doing business as a trust company; that on that date it ceased to transact business under its charter and transferred all of its assets to the Noble County Bank and Trust…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Bundy v. Town of MonticelloIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Irwin's Bank v. Fletcher, Etc., Trust Co., Rec.Indiana Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Cox v. ArnsmannIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Hutchinson v. First National Bank of Michigan CityIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Elliott v. ArmstrongIndiana Supreme Court · 1829

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Szakaly v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1989
  2. In Re CoxCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1943
  3. Wilhelm v. RybandIndiana Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Hack, Rec. v. JobesIndiana Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Muncie Banking Co. v. RetherfordCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1943

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API