Legal Opinion

DuFour v. Bubb

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 15, 1901No. Appeal, No. 262PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal, No. 262, Jan. T., 1900, by defendants, from judgment of C. P. Lycoming Co., Deo. T., 1898, No. 268, on trial by court without a jury in the case of Mary H. DuFour and William M. DuFour v. N. B. Bubb and Fred M. Allen. Ejectment for a house and lot in Williamsport.

Read the full summary

Appeal, No. 262, Jan. T., 1900, by defendants, from judgment of C. P. Lycoming Co., Deo. T., 1898, No. 268, on trial by court without a jury in the case of Mary H. DuFour and William M. DuFour v. N. B. Bubb and Fred M. Allen. Ejectment for a house and lot in Williamsport. The case was tried without a jury by Metzgeb, P. J., who filed the following opinion: This is an action of ejectment brought by the plaintiffs to recover a lot of land in the possession of the defendants, situate in the fifth ward of the city of Williamsport, county of Lycoming and state of Pennsylvania, bounded on the north…

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mb. Justice Mestbezat,

The learned president judge of the court below, Judge Metzger, has, in Iris opinion, clearly and concisely found and stated all the facts of this case. The important question in the case requires a construction of the will of Mahlon Fisher, deceased, and a determination of what estate or interest thereunder his daughter, Mary H. DuFour and her husband, W. M. DuFour, took in the real estate embraced in this action. Judge Metzger held that Mrs. DuFour took an equitable life estate in the premises in dispute. He has supported his conclusions by a convincing…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kunselman v. StineSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1897
  2. Lawrence v. KeenerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1892

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Fortna v. DonaldsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  2. Hinderman v. FisherSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API