Legal Opinion

Manpower, Inc. v. Phillips

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 24, 1962No. 36972Published

1Opinion of the CourtGriffith, J.

There is no substantial disagreement between the parties as to the facts. It is conceded that the plaintiff placed the laborers with the contractor, Phillips; that they worked under the direction and supervision of Phillips; and that the plaintiff paid them for their work on the job. The laborers did improve defendants’ property, and the amount of $1,955.45, paid to the laborers, is the true and correct amount.

The plaintiff had a contract with the contractor, Phillips, to furnish him laborers as he requested from time to time. Plaintiff furnished such laborers, who rendered satisfactory…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Friedman v. County of HampdenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
  2. Robert v. Clapp Co. v. FoxOhio Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Gross Income Tax Division v. Fort Pitt Bridge WorksIndiana Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Howk v. KrotzerOhio Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Hampton v. Incorporated Village of FreeportAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API