Legal Opinion
American Bankers Ass'n v. National Credit Union Administration
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 10, 1999No. Civ.A. 99-00042(CKK)PublishedCited by 118 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
KOLLAR-KOTELLY, District Judge.
For years, the National Credit Union Administration (NCUA) interpreted Section 109 of the Federal Credit Union Act (FCUA), 12 U.S.C. § 1759, to permit various employment groups, each one united by its own peculiar occupational bond but otherwise unrelated to another group, to coalesce and form a “multiple common-bond” credit union. See Interpretative Ruling and Policy Statement (IRPS) 82-1, 47 Fed.Reg. 16775 (1982). Early last year, after the issue had been volleyed twice between this Circuit’s trial and appellate courts, the Supreme Court held…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Hewitt v. HelmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. California State Council of CarpentersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Sampson v. MurraySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Beacon Theatres, Inc. v. WestoverSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by118 opinions
- Hi-Tech Pharmacal Co. v. United States Food & Drug AdministrationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- American Bankers Association v. National Credit Union AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2001
- Morgan Stanley DW Inc. v. RotheDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2001
- Barton v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2001
- Bancoult v. McNamaraDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2002
113 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.