Legal Opinion

Caruth Corporation, W.W. And Mable P. Caruth v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided January 27, 1989No. 88-1015PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PATRICK E. HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judge:

A taxpayer owns an appreciated asset. The asset’s value is attributable largely to an imminent and inevitable payment of earnings. A few days before the payment is due, the taxpayer donates to charity the entire asset, with the right to any income upon it. We must decide if the inevitable payment is taxable as income to the donor. The IRS says that it is; the taxpayer says that it is not. The district court agreed with the taxpayer, reasoning that the taxpayer gave away an appreciated asset without ever himself realizing the appreciation upon it. 688…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Gregory v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Lucas v. EarlSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  3. Helvering v. HorstSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  4. Blair v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  5. Commissioner v. P. G. Lake, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Rauenhorst v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2002
  2. United Parcel Service of America, Inc. v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2001
  3. Estate of Robert G. Kluener, Donald E. Hathaway, Co-Executor, Charlotte J. Kluener v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
  4. Estate of Lisle v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003
  5. Jennifer L. Meisner v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API