Legal Opinion

Titlow v. Pierce County

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 2, 1919No. 15527PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Pierce county, Fletcher, J., entered April 3, 1919, dismissing an action to cancel a tax, tried to the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMackintosh, J.

The appellants were the owners of 1,125 lots in outlying platted additions in Pierce county, and this action was begun for the purpose of cancelling and setting aside taxes thereon for the year 1917.

In the month of July, 1917, Pierce county began an action seeking to condemn these lots for the purpose of an army post site, and in the condemnation suit the jury returned a verdict in the sum of $1,568 as the fair cash market value of the property. This sum *634was paid into the clerk’s office of Pierce county, and the county treasurer asserted a claim against the funds in the sum of $208.58 for…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. First Thought Gold Mines, Ltd. v. Stevens CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Grays Harbor Construction Co. v. Grays Harbor CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Spokane & Inland Empire Railroad v. Spokane CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1914

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kinnear v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Corcoran v. State Board of EqualizationMontana Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Island County v. Calvin Philips & Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API