Mayo v. State
Supreme Court of Alabama
From tbe City Court of Mobile. Tried before tbe ITort. Alex. McKiststRY.
1Opinion of the Court
"WALKEB, J.
Tbe accused was charged under an indictment containing two counts; one for embezzlement, and tbe other for larceny from a storehouse. Tbe sufficiency of tbe count for embezzlement, upon which be was convicted, is objected to, upon tbe ground that it does not describe with requisite certainty tbe property which was tbe alleged subject of tbe offense, and that tbe value of each article is not stated. It is unnecessary to inquire what would have been tbe judgment of tbe common law upon this question, for we regard it settled by tbe Code, section 3503 of which makes tbe forms of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Noles v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1854
- Kane v. PeopleCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1831
- People v. RyndersNew York Supreme Court · 1834
- Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1856
- Elam v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1855
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- People v. AikinMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
- Howard v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1895
- Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1979
- Wooster v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1876
- People v. HatchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.