Legal Opinion

People v. Moore

California Supreme Court

Decided May 10, 1957No. Crim. 5992PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpence, J.

Defendant pleaded not guilty and not guilty by reason of insanity to the charge of murdering one Huida Hoag. The jury found him guilty of murder in the first degree and fixed the penalty at death. Defendant withdrew his insanity plea and, after his motion for new trial had been denied, the death penalty was imposed. The appeal is automatic under section 1239, subdivision (b), of the Penal Code.

Mrs. Hoag was killed at some time between 8 and 11 o’clock on the evening of March 16, 1956. In the afternoon of that day defendant, a 33-year-old carnival worker, left a bar in San Bernardino with a…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. People v. PeeteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  2. People v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  3. People v. BurwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  4. People v. SandersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  5. People v. ReedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. People v. BloomCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  2. State v. AtkinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
  3. Faught Ex Rel. Faught v. WashamSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
  4. People v. KempCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  5. People v. BrubakerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API