Legal Opinion
Conquest Drilling Fluids, Inc. v. Tri-Flo International, Inc.
Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)
Decided May 6, 2004No. 09-02-194 CVPublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DAVID B. GAULTNEY, Justice.
On motion for rehearing, our prior opinion was withdrawn. The following opinion is substituted in its place.
This dispute is over equipment manufactured by Tri-Flo International, Inc. that Conquest Drilling Fluids, Inc., says never worked. Tri-Flo executed a contract to build an oilfield-related “encapsulation unit.” One of the buyers was Coastal Mud, Inc., acting as a funding entity for Grant Peterson, president of Conquest, the eventual owner. Coastal sold the equipment to Conquest and then assigned the litigation rights concerning the unit to Conquest.
Allegi…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- McConnell v. Southside Independent School DistrictTexas Supreme Court · 1993
- State Department of Highways & Public Transportation v. PayneTexas Supreme Court · 1992
- Natividad v. Alexsis, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1994
- Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. Financial Review Services, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2000
- HOLY CROSS CHURCH OF GOD IN CHRIST v. WolfTexas Supreme Court · 2001
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Head v. U.S. Inspect DFW, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2005
- Redmon v. Griffith, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2006
- In re General Motors LLC Ignition Switch LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2017
- Cleveland Regional Medical Center, L.P. v. Celtic Properties, L.C., Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2010
- Omni USA, Inc. v. Parker-Hannifin Corp.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2013
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.