Legal Opinion

Synthetic Patents Co. v. Sutherland

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided November 14, 1927No. 24PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MANTON, Circuit Judge.

This is a suit brought by the appellee under the provisions of section 9 of the Trading with the Enemy Act, as amended by Act June 5,1920 (Comp. St. § Sllo^e). Duisberg, Hess, and Mann were nonresident German nationals, and owned all the capital stock of the appellee, as well as that of the Bayer Company, an American corporation. On January 15, 1918, the stock of both companies was seized by the Alien Property Custodian. It, together with the rights accruing under the terms of contracts made between Duisberg, Hess, and Mann and the appellee, were sold on December 12,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Davis v. SchwartzSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. Lamborn v. County CommissionersSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  3. United States v. BarlowSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  4. Spencer v. LoweCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1912
  5. Hartley v. . Pioneer Iron WorksNew York Court of Appeals · 1905

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Shell Oil Co. v. Cy Miller, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API