Calloway v. Maxwell
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
The sole question raised by petitioner in this action is whether the denial of his motion for an order to have the jury view the area where the crime occurred invalidated his conviction.
It is petitioner’s contention that by such refusal the trial judge deprived him of his constitutional right to call witnesses.
The determination as to whether the jury should view the premises where the crime occurred lies within the sound discretion of the trial court. Section 2945.16, Revised Code, and 23 Corpus Juris Secundum 989, Criminal Law, Section 986. Any claimed abuse of such discretion must be raised…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Walker v. MaxwellOhio Supreme Court · 1965
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. LundgrenOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. ZuernOhio Supreme Court · 1987
- State v. LundgrenOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. KarnsOhio Court of Appeals · 1992
- State v. Waugh, 07ap-619 (5-6-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.