Legal Opinion

Copeland v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided December 9, 1924No. 15939PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLuke, J.

1. - The court instructed the jury as follows: “When arson is charged, the burden is on the State to show, either by direct or by indirect or circumstantial evidence, or by some circumstantial evidence satisfactory to the jury, that the house was actually burned by some criminal agency. Second, the burden is on the State to show that the man the State says did it was the man that did it. Now, when the State does-that, if the defendant’s evidence is insufficient to raise a reasonable doubt in your minds, and the State shows those two things beyond a reasonable doubt, that is all the law…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bone v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Jack Henry Smith v. S. Lamont Smith, Warden, Georgia State PrisonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
  2. Smith v. SmithDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1970
  3. Walker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925
  4. Jack Henry Smith v. S. Lamont Smith, Warden, Georgia State PrisonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
  5. Nasworthy v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API