Walker v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtBloodwoeth, J.
1. The court having charged the jury that, “to warrant a conviction on circumstantial evidence, the proved facts must not only *599be consistent with the hypothesis of guilt, but must exclude every other hypothesis save that of the guilt of the accused” (Penal Code of 1910, § 1010), it was not necessary to give this instruction again in connection with the instruction, given in another part of the charge of the court, that if, upon a consideration of the case, the jury believed beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant was guilty, it was their duty to find him guilty. There is no merit in the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Buckhanon v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1921
- Buchanan v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- McNaughton v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1911
- Knight v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1918
- Copeland v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
3Cited by4 opinions
- Gaulden v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1930
- DeVere v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1932
- Dent v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1931
- Rhodes v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938