Legal Opinion

Walker v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 27, 1925No. 16174PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBloodwoeth, J.

1. The court having charged the jury that, “to warrant a conviction on circumstantial evidence, the proved facts must not only *599be consistent with the hypothesis of guilt, but must exclude every other hypothesis save that of the guilt of the accused” (Penal Code of 1910, § 1010), it was not necessary to give this instruction again in connection with the instruction, given in another part of the charge of the court, that if, upon a consideration of the case, the jury believed beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant was guilty, it was their duty to find him guilty. There is no merit in the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Buckhanon v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1921
  2. Buchanan v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  3. McNaughton v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1911
  4. Knight v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1918
  5. Copeland v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Gaulden v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1930
  2. DeVere v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1932
  3. Dent v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1931
  4. Rhodes v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API