Legal Opinion
White Mountain Apache Tribe v. Williams
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 7, 1984No. 81-5348PublishedCited by 45 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED OPINION
NORRIS, Circuit Judge:
The court’s amended opinion of August 20, 1986, reported at 798 F.2d 1205, is withdrawn. The following disposition replaces the court’s previous opinion.
This appeal presents the question whether Pinetop Logging Company (“Pinetop”) and the White Mountain Apache Tribe (the “Tribe”) have stated a claim under 42 U.S.C. § 19831 for which attorney’s fees *846are available under the Civil Rights Attorney’s Pees Award Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1988 (1976).2
I
The facts of this case are set out more fully in White Mountain Apache Tribe v. Bracker, 448 U.S. 136, 100 S.Ct. 2578, 65…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Railroad Comm'n of Tex. v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Hagans v. LavineSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Commissioner v. SunnenSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. Pacific Coal & Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- The Wilderness Soc. v. Kane County, UtahCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
- Western Air Lines, Inc. v. Port Authority of New York and New JerseyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- American Vantage Companies, Inc. v. Table Mountain RancheriaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Air Transport Association of America v. Public Utilities Commission of the State of California, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Frommhagen v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.