Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Stephan v. Taylor

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided May 28, 1927No. 4998PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtT. Bailey Lee, J.

This was an action brought by the state at the relation of the Attorney General and the Commissioner of Public Welfare to abate an alleged purpresture or public nuisance maintained by the defendant.

It was claimed by the state that the defendant, claiming the right to do so, had entered upon certain property granted the state for public use by the national Congress, known as the Lava Hot Springs, inclosing a part thereof, and maintaining a residence in buildings by him erected thereon; that his occupation was without right, interfering with plaintiff’s endeavor and duty, as trustee of such…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. Twin Falls-Salmon River Land & Water Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1916
  2. City of Llano v. County of LlanoCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1893
  3. People ex rel. Britton v. Park and Ocean RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  4. United States v. Brighton Ranche Co.United States Circuit Court · 1885
  5. State ex rel. Brownell Building Co. v. CochranNebraska Supreme Court · 1925

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Propst v. Board of Educational Lands & FundsNebraska Supreme Court · 1952
  2. State v. CooleyNebraska Supreme Court · 1952
  3. State v. Dakota County, NebraskaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API