People ex rel. Britton v. Park and Ocean Railroad
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtSearls, C. J.
This action was brought to abate an alleged nuisance, and to procure an injunction. Defendants had judgment in the court below, from which, and from an order denying a new trial, plaintiff appeals.
The action was instituted by the attorney-general, in the name of the people of the state of California, on the relation of J. Britton, a citizen of the state, and a resident and tax-payer of the city and county of San Francisco, against the Park and Ocean Railroad Company, and the Pacific Improvement Company, — the latter defendant was, at the commencement of the action, engaged for the other…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Blanc v. KlumpkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
- Requena v. Mayor of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
3Cited by19 opinions
- Higginson v. Treasurer & School House CommissionersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
- Whittaker v. StangvickSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
- Hanlon v. LevinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1935
- Hart v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- Twenty-Second Corp. of Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints v. Oregon Short Line RailroadUtah Supreme Court · 1909
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.