Bell v. Jones
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
McDONOUGH, Justice.
This case involves a suit upon a promissory note executed by appellant in favor of Alfred J. Bell, who later transferred the note to respondent, plaintiff below. Appellant’s defenses to the action in the lower court were (1) that the note had been given to A. J. Bell without any consideration therefor; and (2) that it had been compromised and paid. Appellant further contended respondent was not a holder in due course for value and hence that such defenses were available against the latter. He also sought by counterclaim to recover certain amounts paid on said note…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Meek v. WilsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
- Federal Land Bank v. KoslofskyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1936
- Jessewich v. AbbeneCity of New York Municipal Court · 1935
- Smeltzer v. McCroryCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
- State Bank of Beaver County v. HollingsheadUtah Supreme Court · 1933
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Messick v. PHD Trucking Service, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1980
- Haugens v. FosterAppellate Court of Illinois · 1943
- Federal Farm Mortg. Corp. v. HattenSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1946
- Knox v. GeislerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
- Bell v. JonesUtah Supreme Court · 1943