Flanagan v. Ward
Texas Supreme Court
Error from Eusk.
1Opinion of the CourtWheeler, J.
There is in the record no statement of facts; •and we must presume in support of the judgment that the verdict was warranted by the evidence.
There manifestly was no error in sustaining exceptions to the defendant’s plea in reconvention. The question has not been made in argument for the appellant, and it is not necessary to determine in this case what is the rule as to the measure of damages, in case of eviction, where the vendee was induced to purchase by the fraudulent representation of the vendor, and he has made improvements on the land. For, to entitle the vendee to recover at all on the…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Lockett v. SchurenbergTexas Supreme Court · 1884
- Besso v. SouthworthTexas Supreme Court · 1888
- Graebner v. Limburger's Ex'rsTexas Commission of Appeals · 1927
- Atler v. ErskineCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1908
- Kennerly v. B. F. Avery & Sons Plow Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1927