Ornstein v. Paramount Productions, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
GODDARD, District Judge.
This is a motion by the defendants to dismiss the complaint on the ground that it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. The bill of complaint alleges infringement of the complainant’s copyrighted play entitled “Woman” by the defendants’ motion picture photo-play “Blonde Venus.” The bill asks for the usual relief of an injunction and damages.
By stipulation entered into by the attorney for the complainant and the attorneys for the defendants, a copy of the complainant’s play “Woman” and a print of defendants’ photoplay “Blonde Venus” are deemed…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Nichols v. Universal Pictures CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
- Dymow v. BoltonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1926
- Harold Lloyd Corporation v. WitwerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1933
- Fendler v. MoroscoNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
- United States v. 20 Strings Seed PearlsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1929
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Christianson v. West Pub. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1945
- Echevarria v. Warner Bros. Pictures, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 1935
- Bueno v. La Compania Peruana De Radio-Difusion, S.A.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1977
- Eisman v. Samuel Goldwyn, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1938
- Hewitt v. CowardNew York Supreme Court · 1943
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.