Eisman v. Samuel Goldwyn, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
WOOLSEY, District Judge.
This motion to dismiss the complaint herein is granted.
The defendants may have a decree dismissing the complaint with costs which, in respect of that part of the cause founded on the Copyright Act, 17 U.S.C.A. § 1 et seq., will, under Section 40 thereof, 17 U.S.C.A. § 40, include reasonable counsel fees to the defendants.
I. This is a motion based on the practice approved by me in Lowenfels v. Nathan, D.C., 2 F.Supp. 73, 74, and explained more fully by my decision in Shipman v. R. K. O. Radio Pictures, Inc., et al., D.C., 20 F.Supp. 249.
This practice is not now novel…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Nichols v. Universal Pictures CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
- Dymow v. BoltonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1926
- Holmes v. HurstSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- In Re OsofskyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1931
- United States v. 20 Strings Seed PearlsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1929
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Monolith Portland Midwest Company, a Nevada Corporation v. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
- Christianson v. West Pub. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1945
- Christie v. HarrisDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1942
- Smith v. George E. Muehlebach Brewing CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1956
- Burnett v. LambinoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1962
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.