Legal Opinion
Sherburne v. Meade
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided June 26, 1939PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRonan, J.
In this action of tort for deceit, the plaintiff seeks to recover damages arising out of the purchase of shares of the capital stock of John Paulding Meade Com-*357pony, which, he alleges, he was induced, to purchase by the fraudulent misrepresentations of the defendant. There was a verdict for the plaintiff. The case is here upon exceptions to the refusal of the judge to direct a verdict for the defendant, to the admission of evidence, to the refusal to grant certain requests for rulings, and to portions of the charge.
There was evidence that the plaintiff, then employed by a surety company, was…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Barnes v. Berkshire Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
- Nash v. Minnesota Title Insurance & Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1895
- Commonwealth v. AbbottMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1881
- Piper v. ChildsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
- Whiting v. PriceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1898
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Bond Leather Co., Inc. v. Q.T. Shoe Mfg. Co., Inc. And Martin S. Nadler, Bond Leather Co., Inc. v. Q.T. Shoe Mfg. Co., Inc., Melvin Nadler, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985
- Berry v. KyesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
- Tosti v. AyikMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
- Commonwealth v. SheppardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
- Commonwealth v. BinkiewiczMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1961
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.