Legal Opinion

Chao v. New Jersey Licensed Beverage Ass'n, Inc.

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided November 13, 2006No. 04-CV-5692PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LETTER OPINION ORIGINAL TO BE FILED WITH THE CLERK OF THE COURT

PISANO, District Judge.

Dear Parties:

Presently before the Court are two motions filed by Starline USA, LLC (“Star-line”) 1 and Horizon Healthcare Systems (“Horizon”), respectively, seeking to dismiss the Third Party Complaint filed by Stephen DiTomasso and Midlantic Healthcare, Inc. (“Midlantic,” collectively with DiTomasso, the “Midlantic defendants”) under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) and/or Rule 14(a). For the reasons set forth below, Starline’s motion is granted and Horizon’s motion is denied.

I. Background

This is…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re Cardinal Health, Inc. ERISA LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2006
  2. Tesch v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1982
  3. PPV Connection, Inc. v. RodriguezDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2005

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. BRG HARRISON LOFTS URBAN RENEWAL LLC v. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANYDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2020
  2. ERNEST BOCK & SONS, INC. v. DEAN ENTERPRISES, INC.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2023
  3. XL SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY v. PCS WIRELESS LLCDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API