Miller v. BAS Technical Employment Placement Co.
District Court, S.D. West Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
HADEN, Chief Judge.
Pending is Plaintiffs motion to remand. The Court DENIES the motion without prejudice. 1
I. INTRODUCTION
This action presents the Hobson’s choice frequently facing defendants in state civil actions. In sum, a non-resident defendant joined with a resident defendant, whom the former believes is fraudulently joined, must often choose between (1) remaining in state court and letting the one-year time limit allowed for diversity-based removal expire; 2 or (2) removing the case, risking a remand, and suffering fees and costs for improvident removal. 3
In…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- B., Inc. v. Miller Brewing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Patricia J. Mayes v. Stanley Rapoport Judith Rapoport David Key, D/B/A Key Coffee Roasters, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
- Mildred MARSHALL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MANVILLE SALES CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee, and Robert L. Mason, DefendantCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993
- Hardy v. Ajax Magnathermic Corp.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2000
- Livingston v. K-Mart Corp.District Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1998
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Parker v. County of OxfordDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2002
- Miller v. BAS Technical Employment Placement Co.District Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2001