Legal Opinion

Miller v. BAS Technical Employment Placement Co.

District Court, S.D. West Virginia

Decided January 12, 2001No. CIV. A. 2:00-0896PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

HADEN, Chief Judge.

Pending is Plaintiffs motion to remand. The Court DENIES the motion without prejudice. 1

I. INTRODUCTION

This action presents the Hobson’s choice frequently facing defendants in state civil actions. In sum, a non-resident defendant joined with a resident defendant, whom the former believes is fraudulently joined, must often choose between (1) remaining in state court and letting the one-year time limit allowed for diversity-based removal expire; 2 or (2) removing the case, risking a remand, and suffering fees and costs for improvident removal. 3

In…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. B., Inc. v. Miller Brewing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
  2. Patricia J. Mayes v. Stanley Rapoport Judith Rapoport David Key, D/B/A Key Coffee Roasters, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
  3. Mildred MARSHALL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MANVILLE SALES CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee, and Robert L. Mason, DefendantCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993
  4. Hardy v. Ajax Magnathermic Corp.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2000
  5. Livingston v. K-Mart Corp.District Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1998

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Parker v. County of OxfordDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2002
  2. Miller v. BAS Technical Employment Placement Co.District Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API