Ex Parte Isbell
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Dissent
I wrote the original opinion that was released March 7, 1997. That opinion affirmed the trial court's order compelling arbitration of the Isbells' claims. Justices Maddox, Houston, and See concurred in my opinion. Justice Butts concurred in the result. That opinion did not state that the Isbells had no valid claim, nor did it say that Southern had a defense to the Isbells' claims. It simply stated that the parties must arbitrate the dispute in accordance with the arbitration agreement contained in the installment sales contract with American Housing. Since March 7, 1997, the Court has changed…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Allied-Bruce Terminix Cos., Inc. v. DobsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Sunkist Soft Drinks, Inc., Del Monte Corporation, Nabisco Brands, Inc. v. Sunkist Growers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993
- McBro Planning and Development Company and McCarthy Brothers Company, a Joint Venture v. Triangle Electrical Construction Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
- Ex Parte GatesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1996
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.