Legal Opinion

United States of America for the Use and Benefit of Control Systems, Inc. v. Arundel Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided April 11, 1990No. 89-4289PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLARK, Chief Judge:

I

This suit involves various claims between the prime contractor, a subcontractor, and one of the subcontractor’s materialmen on Lock B of the Tennessee-Tombigbee Waterway Project in Smithville, Mississippi. The suit was originally instituted by the materialman for breach of contract and for payment on the prime contractor’s Miller Act bond. See 40 U.S.C. §§ 270a to 270d. This is the second appeal which has been taken in this action. The district court in its latest decision dismissed the prime contractor’s counterclaims against the materi-alman for delay damages. We affirm.

II

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. E. C. Ernst, Inc. v. Manhattan Construction Company of Texas, Providence Hospital, Fairbanks-Morse, Inc., Charles H. McCauley Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
  2. E. C. Ernst, Inc. v. Manhattan Construction Company of Texas, Providence Hospital, Fairbanks-Morse, Inc., Charles H. McCauley Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
  3. Burns v. Washington Savings & Great Southern Savings & Loan Ass'nMississippi Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Yazoo M.V.R. Co. v. SideboardMississippi Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Lovett v. EL Garner, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1987

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Daniel International Corporation, Cross-Appellant v. Fischbach & Moore, Inc., Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
  2. Woodring v. RobinsonDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API