Legal Opinion

Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority v. City of Somerville

Massachusetts Superior Court

Decided April 2, 2007No. 064616BLS1Published

1Opinion of the Court

van Gestel, Allan, J.

These consolidated matters are before the Court on four cross motions for summary judgment and a motion for judgment on a case stated. The motions are; (1) Defendant Outdoor Advertising Board’s Motion for Summary Judgment on Counts I and III of the Cities’ Complaint; (2) Plaintiff Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority’s Motion for Summary Judgment; (3) Motion by the City of Melrose for Summary Judgment; (4) Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc.’s Motion for Summary Judgment on All Claims and Counterclaims Pursuant to Rule 56; and (5) City of Somerville’s Motion ... in Support…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Kourouvacilis v. General Motors Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  2. Pederson v. Time, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
  3. Cassesso v. Commissioner of CorrectionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
  4. Hakim v. Massachusetts Insurers' Insolvency FundMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
  5. Miller v. MooneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API