Legal Opinion

Breitbart v. Galligan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 10, 1988PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*324OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

On April 15, 1987, respondent Justice summarily held petitioner in contempt and deferred further action thereon until the conclusion of the trial. The adjudication of contempt resulted from a colloquy in which petitioner, 1 of 3 attorneys representing codefendants in a homicide trial, intemperately asserted that respondent was improperly holding ex parte conferences with the prosecutor, "planning the trial”, and perpetrating "a fraud on the People of the State of New York”. Petitioner’s offending comments were made in open court, but outside of the presence of the jury.…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Cooke v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. Katz v. MurtaghNew York Court of Appeals · 1971

4Cited by10 opinions

  1. Kunstler v. GalliganAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  2. O'Connell v. TaddeoNew York Supreme Court · 1997
  3. People v. PennisiNew York Supreme Court · 1990
  4. People In re M.R.Supreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2016
  5. Proper v. ProperAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API