Anderson v. Holsteen

(dissenting) — I join in the dissenting opinion of Judge Bliss. I do not favor a holding that a pedestrian walks on the right-hand side of the highway at his peril, even though he may be violating the statute. The general rule is that a pedestrian’s violation of such statute is negligence but “such violation must be tbe proximate cause- of the injury- in order to prevent recovery, and whether such violation is the proximate cause is ordinarily a question for the jury.” 3' Berry, Law of Automobiles, Seventh Edition, section 3.242. Cases supporting the above rule are: Sharick v. Galloway, 19…