State v. Peeler

¶27 (dissenting) — I dissent because the State did not violate the intrastate detainers act (IDA), chapter 9.98 RCW. Ryan James Peeler’s first request for final disposition did not comply with the IDA and, therefore, did not trigger the 120-day period. Peeler’s second request for final disposition was sufficient to start the 120-day period under the IDA, and a trial was timely set. To reach its holding, the majority misinterprets the requirements of the IDA.

¶28 This case involves Peeler’s requests for final disposition of an untried information under the IDA. The IDA provides that an…