Legal Opinion

Lamb v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 24, 1978No. 77-20PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

The single point presented on this appeal is that the trial judge erred in denying the defendant’s motion to strike “also, known as Robert Morgan” from the information. The appellant, Harry Lamb, was found guilty by a jury of burglary of a structure with intent to commit petit larceny and of petit larceny.

An information was filed which charged the defendant as “Harry Lamb also known as Robert Morgan.” The defendant pleaded not guilty at arraignment. Immediately prior to trial, he moved to strike the designated portion of the information. Defense counsel admitted that the defendant had used…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. GraysonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948
  2. Castle v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974
  3. State v. VarnerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
  4. D'ALLESSANDRO v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1937
  5. The PEOPLE v. FogniniIllinois Supreme Court · 1970

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Rodriguez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  2. D'ANNA v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  3. Highsmith v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
  4. Lee v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API