Legal Opinion

Old Colony Trust & Savings Bank v. Sherrill-King Mill & Lumber Co.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided May 14, 1920PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from McCracken Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Quin

Affirming.

Schultz & Cowen Co., of Chicago, Ills, (hereinafter referred to as the company), in 1913, asked the SherrillKing Mill & Lumber Co. (for brevity called the appellee herein), for prices on lumber. Not being advised as to applicant’s financial standing, appellee made inquiry of appellant (referred to hereinafter as the bank), and was told by one of the bank’s, officers they considered the account good for $2,000.00. Appellee sold a bill of goods to the company amounting to $804.07, taking their notes in payment therefor. The notes were not paid at…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Louisville N. R. Co. v. Curtis' AdministratorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929
  2. Bradford v. Union Trust CompanyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
  3. Lafontaine v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1926
  4. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Curtis' AdministratorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1929
  5. Vale v. Illinois Pipe Line Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API