Legal Opinion
Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Curtis' Administrator
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Decided November 26, 1929PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*278Opinion op the Count by
Judge Willis
Affirming.
A passenger train of the Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company collided with a Chevrolet coupe at a highway crossing in the town of Stanford, Ky. The coupe at the time of the collision was being driven by Chester A. Curtis, and Robert E.- Parish, Mrs. Daisy Pearl McKiddy, and Elbert Elmer Strong were riding with him. Parish owned the car, and Curtis and Strong were his employees. Mrs. McKiddy was a passenger or guest, ■but the difference in relationship of the various persons to the coupe plays no part in the case. All of the occupants of the…
2Cases cited66 opinions
- Illinois Central Ry. Co. v. Murphy's Admr.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1906
- Louisville Gas & Electric Co. v. BeaucondCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1920
- Louisville & Nashville R. R. v. McNary's AdmrCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1908
- Sutton's Administrator v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
- Winston's Administrator v. City of HendersonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- W. H. Simmons & Co. v. Price's AdministratorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
- Consolidated Coach Corporation v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931