Legal Opinion

Carter v. Burgess

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided October 8, 1948PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpalding, J.

This is a petition for a writ of mandamus to try title to two offices of selectmen of the town of *296Tewksbury. The respondents’ demurrer to the petition was overruled, and the case was then heard upon agreed facts. Judgment was entered ordering a writ of mandamus to issue commanding the respondents to cease acting as selectmen of the town of Tewksbury and requiring the respondents to recognize the petitioners as such selectmen. From this judgment and the order overruling their demurrer, the respondents appealed.

Facts material to this appeal are these: For many years the town at its annual…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Scaccia v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
  2. Steffe v. Old Colony RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892
  3. Keough v. Board of AldermenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892
  4. Doggett v. HooperMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
  5. Parrott v. PlunkettMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. City of Waltham v. MignosaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1951
  2. Old Colony Trust Co. v. Commissioner of Corporations & TaxationMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1962
  3. Ashkenazy v. RM Bradley & Co. Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1952
  4. Petti v. LyonsMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1980
  5. Board of Selectmen v. Civil Service CommissionMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API