Shults v. Moore
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Ohio
[This was an action in ejectment by Conrad Shults against Lewis Moore. For a motion for a prior continuance of this cause, see Case No. 12,825.]
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF
THE COURT.
This action of ejectment was brought to this court, under the act of congress, from the state court in which it was commenced. Both parties claim the land in controversy under James Drake. The lessor of the plaintiff first introduced a deed from Drake to Dehant, dated the 26th September, 1817, and a mortgage, dated 12th August, ISIS, by Dehant to the lessor of the plaintiff. The mortgage was acknowledged before the mayor of Cincinnati on the day it bears date. The defendant introduced a deed for the same premises from James Drake to the defendant Moore, dated 9th…
2Cited by14 opinions
- Tavenner v. BarrettWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1883
- Stevens v. HamptonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1870
- 11 Collier bankr.cas.2d 648, Bankr. L. Rep. P 70,061 in Re Hartman Paving, Inc., South Berkeley Lumber & Supply, Inc., Debtors-In-Possession. Thomas G. Pyne v. Hartman Paving, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1984
- Hardesty v. Citifinancial, Inc. (In Re Roberts)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 2009
- Rhiel v. Huntington National Bank (In Re Phalen)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 2011
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.