Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Anderson v. Bernhard Realty Sales Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 23, 1974No. Appeals, 82 and 117Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Concurring and Dissenting Opinion by

Price, J.:

I concur in the Majority Opinion in this appeal, which reverses the lower court’s entry of a summary judgment in favor of Bernhard Realty Sales Company. The failure of Bernhard Realty to raise the statute of limitations in its answer constituted a waiver of that defense under Rule 1032 of the Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure. The entry of a summary judgment on the basis of a defense not timely raised was not proper, and, therefore, must be reversed.

I respectfully dissent from the Majority Opinion with regard to the appeals against Revest,…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Ayers v. MorganSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  2. James Bros. Co. v. Union B. & T. Co. of DuBoisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  3. Paulish v. BakaitisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  4. Fisher v. HillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  5. Zarlinsky v. LaudenslagerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API